STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITS FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION

WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

STIPULATION

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's May 27, 2016 order, Defendants shall file a motion to dismiss by July 6, 2016, Plaintiff shall file an opposition by August 5, 2016, and Defendants shall file a reply by August 15, 2016;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Northern District of California Local Civil Rules 7-2, 7-3, and 7-4, Defendants are limited to 25 pages for their notice and supporting papers and Plaintiff is limited to 25 pages for its memorandum in opposition to Defendants' motion;

WHEREAS, Defendants' motion to dismiss will raise complex issues of constitutional law arising under the First and Fifth Amendments;

WHEREAS, Defendants believe that increasing the page limits will assist the Court in adjudicating this matter and Plaintiff; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff does not believe that there are grounds for dismissal or that an enlarged page limit is necessary for Defendants to present their argument, but has agreed not to oppose the Defendants' motion to facilitate prompt resolution of this matter,

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendants that

1. Defendants may submit a motion to dismiss of up to 35 pages;

2. Plaintiff may submit an opposition brief of up to 35 pages; and

3. Defendants may submit a reply brief of up to 15 pages.

Nothing herein shall change or otherwise affect any dates currently set per the Court's May 27, 2016 order (Docket No. 28).

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.