CANOPIUS CAPITAL TWO LIMITED v. JEANNE ESTATES APARTMENTS, INC., 11-Cv-4070. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160205843
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . On August 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 136). Following the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 143). In each of these filings, Plaintiffs' certificate of service indicates that the papers were electronically served to the other parties in this case, either through the CM/ECF system or by e-mail. However, Separate Defendants Steve Johnson and St
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . On August 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 136). Following the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 143). In each of these filings, Plaintiffs' certificate of service indicates that the papers were electronically served to the other parties in this case, either through the CM/ECF system or by e-mail. However, Separate Defendants Steve Johnson and Ste..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
On August 19, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 136). Following the filing of the Third Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 143). In each of these filings, Plaintiffs' certificate of service indicates that the papers were electronically served to the other parties in this case, either through the CM/ECF system or by e-mail. However, Separate Defendants Steve Johnson and Steve Johnson d/b/a The Cooker are proceeding pro se in this case (ECF No. 74), and the Court is unaware of any consent by Steve Johnson to receive electronic service. There is nothing on the docket to indicate that Plaintiffs have served these Separate Defendants via the P.O. Box address listed for Steve Johnson in the Court's CM/ECF system.
The Court directs Plaintiffs to submit their proof of service as to these Separate Defendants on or before Tuesday, February 9, 2016. If service of the filings mentioned above was never completed upon these Separate Defendants, Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause why the claims against these Separate Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to effectuate service and/or failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
