Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Johnson v. County of Santa Clara, Case No: 18-cv-06264-EJD. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190125b30 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION OF COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEFENDANTS' AND PLAINTIFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS ON COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD J. DAVILA , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, and request this Court order same, that Plaintiff's Opposition to the County Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. 42, 1/11/19) currently due January 25th, 2019 for filing, may be extended to February 1st, 2019 for filing, and the D
More

STIPULATION OF COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEFENDANTS' AND PLAINTIFF RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFS ON COUNTY DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, and request this Court order same, that Plaintiff's Opposition to the County Defendants' Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. 42, 1/11/19) currently due January 25th, 2019 for filing, may be extended to February 1st, 2019 for filing, and the Defendants reply brief filing may be extended to February 8th, 2019.

The parties submit there would be no need to change the current hearing date of March 28th, 2019 due to these one-week extensions.

IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED.

ORDER

Upon review of the foregoing stipulation, submitted by and through counsel for the County of Santa Clara Defendants' and Plaintiff, the Court does hereby adopt the requested stipulated orders as the order of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer