Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

P.S. PRODUCTS, INC. v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., 4:13-cv-00342 KGB. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20130903796 Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. Before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 7) and plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 10). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 12). Defendants filed a reply to plaintiffs' response (Dkt. No. 16). Defendants also filed a response to plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint in which
More

ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 7) and plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 10). Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim (Dkt. No. 12). Defendants filed a reply to plaintiffs' response (Dkt. No. 16).

Defendants also filed a response to plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint in which they do not oppose plaintiffs' motion (Dkt. No. 17). For good cause shown, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint is granted (Dkt. No. 10). Plaintiffs shall have up to and including September 13, 2013, to file their amended complaint. Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is denied at this time as moot (Dkt. No. 7). If they deem it prudent, defendants may renew their, or file another, motion to dismiss after plaintiffs file their amended complaint.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer