Adams v. Berryhill, : 2:17-cv-02087-EFB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20181113i63
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended by 30 days, from November 12, 2018, to December 12, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time bec
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended by 30 days, from November 12, 2018, to December 12, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time beca..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended by 30 days, from November 12, 2018, to December 12, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because the case presents novel issues of law that will require additional research.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.
Counsel apologizes to the Court for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
