Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TRACY v. COLVIN, 2:13-CV-00570-CKD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140210622 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1920 CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's previously filed Motion for Equal Access to Justice Act Fees is hereby withdrawn. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's previously filed Motion for Equal Access to Justice Act Fees is hereby withdrawn.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff will be awarded attorney fees in the amount of three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and zero dollars ($00.00) in costs under Taxation of Costs, 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d), 1920.

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the Defendant will consider any assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's counsel, Jesse Kaplan. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2252-2253 (2010), the ability to honor any such assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the Defendant will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made directly to Jesse Kaplan, pursuant to any assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer