TAYLOR v. FRY, 1:13-cv-67-DPM-BD. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130911610
Visitors: 29
Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Proposed Partial Recommended Disposition, N o 4. Taylor has not objected. After reviewing the proposal for clear factual error and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes), the Court adopts it in full. All claims against Bunik are dismissed without prejudice. Taylor's defamation claim and his equal protection claim (styled as sexual discrimination)
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Proposed Partial Recommended Disposition, N o 4. Taylor has not objected. After reviewing the proposal for clear factual error and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes), the Court adopts it in full. All claims against Bunik are dismissed without prejudice. Taylor's defamation claim and his equal protection claim (styled as sexual discrimination) a..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Proposed Partial Recommended Disposition, No 4. Taylor has not objected. After reviewing the proposal for clear factual error and for legal error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes), the Court adopts it in full. All claims against Bunik are dismissed without prejudice. Taylor's defamation claim and his equal protection claim (styled as sexual discrimination) against Fry are dismissed without prejudice. Taylor's sexual harassment claim against Fry remains.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
