Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tianyi Liu v. Hertz Corporation, 16-cv-05525-VKD. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180830b28 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been informed that the parties have conditionally agreed to a settlement, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are VACATED. On or before September 28, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). Rule 41(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order (i) by notice if the defendants have not filed an answ
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT

The Court having been informed that the parties have conditionally agreed to a settlement, all previously scheduled deadlines and appearances are VACATED.

On or before September 28, 2018, the parties shall file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). Rule 41(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss a case without a court order (i) by notice if the defendants have not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment, or (ii) by stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared. Because defendants have filed an answer, plaintiff must file a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

If a dismissal is not filed by the specified date, then the parties shall appear in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, 280 S. 1st St, San Jose, California on October 9, 2018, 10:00 a.m. and show cause, if any, why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Additionally, the parties shall file a statement in response to this Order to Show Cause no later than October 2, 2018 advising as to (1) the status of the activities of the parties in finalizing settlement; and (2) how much additional time, if any, is requested to finalize the settlement and file the dismissal. If a dismissal is filed as ordered, the Order to Show Cause hearing will be automatically vacated and the parties need not file a statement in response to this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer