Olic v. Beard, 2:16-cv-0720 JAM AC P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180928b77
Visitors: 43
Filed: Sep. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Lizarraga and Payne waived service of process and therefore had until September 21, 2018, to file a response to the complaint. ECF No. 22. On September 21, 2018, counsel for defendants docketed an answer, but mistakenly filed a declaration intended for another case instead of an answer. ECF No. 23. Defendants have yet to file an answer or other response to the complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the fi
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Lizarraga and Payne waived service of process and therefore had until September 21, 2018, to file a response to the complaint. ECF No. 22. On September 21, 2018, counsel for defendants docketed an answer, but mistakenly filed a declaration intended for another case instead of an answer. ECF No. 23. Defendants have yet to file an answer or other response to the complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the fil..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Lizarraga and Payne waived service of process and therefore had until September 21, 2018, to file a response to the complaint. ECF No. 22. On September 21, 2018, counsel for defendants docketed an answer, but mistakenly filed a declaration intended for another case instead of an answer. ECF No. 23. Defendants have yet to file an answer or other response to the complaint.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the filing of this order, defendants Lizarraga and Payne shall show good cause in writing for failing to respond to the complaint. The filing of a response to the complaint will be deemed full compliance with this order and will discharge the order to show cause.
Source: Leagle
