ALSTON v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, CIV S-11-2079 JAM EFB PS. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120203754
Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. On November 18, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. On November 18, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ..
More
ORDER
JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.
On November 18, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 18, 2011, are ADOPTED; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and for a preliminary injunction, Dckt. No. 10, is denied.
Source: Leagle
