United States v. Nunes, 2:19-CR-129-MCE. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200127939
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 6, 2020. On January 15, 2020, on its own motion due to the unavailability of the judge, the Court vacated the status conference and continued it to June 11, 2020. ECF 40. 2. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: a) The government has represented that th
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 6, 2020. On January 15, 2020, on its own motion due to the unavailability of the judge, the Court vacated the status conference and continued it to June 11, 2020. ECF 40. 2. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: a) The government has represented that the..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
STIPULATION
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 6, 2020. On January 15, 2020, on its own motion due to the unavailability of the judge, the Court vacated the status conference and continued it to June 11, 2020. ECF 40.
2. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes over 100 GB of electronic documents including well over 10,000 of pages of police reports, search warrant returns, subpoena returns, cellphone extractions, audio/video files, photographs, and bank/financial records. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.
b) Counsel for Defendants Monica Nunes, Talalima Toilolo, and Johnathon Ward ("defendants") desire additional time to review the current charges, review discovery, conduct research and investigation into the charges and alleged acts, consult with their clients, and otherwise prepare for trial.
c) At this time, the defendants have no objection to Court's continuance of the status conference to June 11, 2020, and agree that such a continuance is necessary for effective preparation as outlined below.
d) Counsel for defendants believe that the Court's continuance will provide them reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
e) The government does not object to the continuance.
f) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
g) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of February 6, 2020, to June 11, 2020 inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance ordered by the Court and agreed to and requested by the defendants, on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
3. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: January 23, 2020 McGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
/s/ ROBERT J. ARTUZ
ROBERT J. ARTUZ
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dated: January 23, 2020 /s/ CHRISTINA SINHA (with permission)
CHRISTINA SINHA
Counsel for Defendant
MONICA NUNES
Dated: January 23, 2020 /s/ CHRIS COSCA (with permission)
CHRIS COSCA
Counsel for Defendant
TALALIMA TOILOLO
Dated: January 23, 2020 /s/ TASHA CHALFANT (with permission)
TASHA PARIS CHALFANT
Counsel for Defendant
JOHNATHON WARD
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
