Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Doe v. San Joaquin County, 2:18-cv-00667-TLN-AC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190809a85 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PENDING SETTLEMENT [E.D. Local Rule 144; Fed. R. Civ. P. 6] TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Eastern District Civil Local Rule 144 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, Defendants San Joaquin County, Sheriff Steve Moore, and Danny Swanson (collectively "Defendants") and Plaintiff Jane Doe ("Plaintiff"), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to an extension of time for
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PENDING SETTLEMENT

[E.D. Local Rule 144; Fed. R. Civ. P. 6]

Pursuant to Eastern District Civil Local Rule 144 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6, Defendants San Joaquin County, Sheriff Steve Moore, and Danny Swanson (collectively "Defendants") and Plaintiff Jane Doe ("Plaintiff"), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to an extension of time for all Defendants to move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), as follows:

1. On June 9, 2019, Plaintiff filed her FAC, alleging various federal and state law claims.

2. The parties agreed to conduct a mediation; therefore, on June 13, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation extending Defendants' time to respond to Plaintiff's FAC to August 19, 2019, pending the mediation, which the Court so ordered on June 14, 2019.

3. On August 5, 2019, all parties and their counsel attended the mediation. At the mediation, they were able to reach a global settlement of the entire action subject to certain specific conditions. If the conditions are satisfied, this entire action will be dismissed with prejudice.

4. The parties anticipate it will take approximately 60 days to finalize the settlement documents and perform these conditions.

5. The parties thus request that Defendants' time to move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's FAC be extended 90 days, through and including November 18, 2019. There is no trial date and the Court has not yet issued a Rule 16 scheduling order.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS STIPULATED, by and between all parties through their respective counsel of record, that:

(1) Defendants San Joaquin County and Sheriff Steve Moore's deadline to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the FAC be extended through and including November 18, 2019.

(2) Defendant Danny Swanson's deadline to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the FAC be extended through and including November 18, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: August 7, 2019 HERUM CRABTREE SUNTAG A California Professional Corporation By: /s/ Dana A. Suntag DANA A. SUNTAG Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN and SHERIFF STEVE MOORE Dated: August 7, 2019 BURKE, WILLIAMS, & SORENSEN, LLP By: /s/ Gregory B. Thomas GREGORY B. THOMAS Attorneys for Defendant DANNY SWANSON Dated: August 7, 2019. LAW OFFICES OF STANLEY GOFF By: /s/ Stanley Goff STANLEY GOFF, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiff JANE DOE

ORDER

IN CONSIDERATION of the parties' Stipulation, and for good cause shown therein, it is ORDERED that Defendants' deadline to move, plead, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended from August 19, 2019 through and including November 18, 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer