U.S. v. Klipp, 2:14-cr-0107 GEB KJN P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180530a84
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. On April 24, 2018, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Movant has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Id. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant sh
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. On April 24, 2018, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Movant has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Id. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant sho..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se. On April 24, 2018, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Movant has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Id.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's April 24, 2018 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition. Movant is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that the § 2255 motion be dismissed.
Source: Leagle
