NORRIS v. MAY, 2:12CV00041 KGB/HDY. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120801872
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID YOUNG, Magistrate Judge. On July 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to his requests for production of documents. Defendants filed a response in opposition (docket entry #25), noting that Plaintiff's requests were filed on July 13, 2012 (docket entry #22), and the response time for those requests has not yet run. Defendants also note that an earlier discovery request was filed before the complaint had been served on them (docket entry #4), and that the requests
Summary: ORDER DAVID YOUNG, Magistrate Judge. On July 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to his requests for production of documents. Defendants filed a response in opposition (docket entry #25), noting that Plaintiff's requests were filed on July 13, 2012 (docket entry #22), and the response time for those requests has not yet run. Defendants also note that an earlier discovery request was filed before the complaint had been served on them (docket entry #4), and that the requests w..
More
ORDER
DAVID YOUNG, Magistrate Judge.
On July 13, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel responses to his requests for production of documents. Defendants filed a response in opposition (docket entry #25), noting that Plaintiff's requests were filed on July 13, 2012 (docket entry #22), and the response time for those requests has not yet run. Defendants also note that an earlier discovery request was filed before the complaint had been served on them (docket entry #4), and that the requests were not properly served on them. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion (docket entry #21) is DENIED. However, Defendants should respond to all of Plaintiff's discovery requests pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
