Filed: Aug. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 15, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO COMPLETE PRE-DISCOVERY MEDIATION AND CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. On May 16, 2014, following a hearing on Defendants D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci's (collectively "State Defendants") motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (TAC), the Court referred the parties to private mediation and ordered that mediation was to be completed wi
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO COMPLETE PRE-DISCOVERY MEDIATION AND CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. On May 16, 2014, following a hearing on Defendants D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci's (collectively "State Defendants") motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (TAC), the Court referred the parties to private mediation and ordered that mediation was to be completed wit..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO COMPLETE PRE-DISCOVERY MEDIATION AND CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
On May 16, 2014, following a hearing on Defendants D. Moore, R. Chan, R. Riley, T. Foss, G. Moon, T. Alioto and R. Matteucci's (collectively "State Defendants") motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (TAC), the Court referred the parties to private mediation and ordered that mediation was to be completed within ninety (90) days.1 (ECF 132.)
The parties, Plaintiff Paul Hoa, State Defendants, and Defendants T. Gregory Stagnitto, Bridge Transport, Stag Leasing Inc., and David F. Lopez, by and through their respective counsel, have agreed to participate in private mediation and stipulate that the time for the parties to complete a pre-discovery mediation be extended to November 13, 2014. The parties further request that the Case Management Conference set for October 2, 2014, be continued to December 11, 2014.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. State Defendants' motion to dismiss was taken under submission and on May 23, 2014, the Court granted in part and denied in part State Defendants' motion. (ECF 133.)
