Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., 3:14-cv-04741-RS (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171108942 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CORRECTION OF THE DEADLINES FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO SANDOZ'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SET FORTH IN ECF DOCKET ENTRIES RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited and Defendants Sandoz Inc., Sandoz International GmbH, Sandoz GmbH, and Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d., through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the deadlines for res
More

STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CORRECTION OF THE DEADLINES FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO SANDOZ'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SET FORTH IN ECF DOCKET ENTRIES

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited and Defendants Sandoz Inc., Sandoz International GmbH, Sandoz GmbH, and Lek Pharmaceuticals d.d., through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the deadlines for responses and replies to dispositive motions are set in the Court's current Scheduling Orders (14-cv-04741 Dkt. No. 259; 16-cv-02581 Dkt. No. 91) as November 13, 2017 and November 21, 2017, respectively;

WHEREAS, the ECF docket entries for Sandoz's summary judgment motions (14-cv-04741 Dkt. Nos. 280 & 281; 16-cv-02581 Dkt. Nos. 118 & 119) do not reflect the due dates set forth in the Scheduling Orders and thus incorrectly state that "Responses due by 11/8/2017. Replies due by 11/15/2017";

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties request that the Court correct the response and reply deadlines set forth in the ECF docket entries for Sandoz's summary judgment motions (14-cv-04741 Dkt. Nos. 280 & 281; 16-cv-02581 Dkt. Nos. 118 & 119).

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories shown above.

Dated: November 7, 2017. By: /s/ Vernon M. Winters Vernon M. Winters

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer