Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Shannon v. Sacramento County, 2:15-cv-00967-KJM-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170406901 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 05, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . TO THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT: The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, jointly request that the Court modify the current scheduling order as set forth herein. WHEREAS on November 24, 2014 an action was commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento, entitled Salvador Shannon, Plaintiff, v. County of Sacramento, DOES 1 to 20, Defendants, Case No
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

TO THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT:

The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, jointly request that the Court modify the current scheduling order as set forth herein.

WHEREAS on November 24, 2014 an action was commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Sacramento, entitled Salvador Shannon, Plaintiff, v. County of Sacramento, DOES 1 to 20, Defendants, Case No. 34-2014-00172136;

WHEREAS Plaintiff's complaint was removed to this Court by Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a);

WHEREAS on May 11, 2016, Plaintiff filed a Fifth Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS on June 1, 2016, Defendants answered the complaint;

WHEREAS the Court's scheduling order was entered on June 7, 2016, and modified once by stipulated order on November 3, 2016;

WHEREAS pursuant to the current scheduling order, fact discovery is to be completed by May 15, 2017;

WHEREAS the parties previously had the depositions of the Defendants and five other officers scheduled to take place on March 15, 16, and 17, 2017;

WHEREAS during the week preceding these depositions, counsel for Plaintiff learned of a last minute trial conflict that caused him to have to postpone these depositions;

WHEREAS the parties have been able to reschedule most, but not all, of the depositions within the time remaining for fact discovery;

WHEREAS the parties anticipate being able to complete all of the depositions by May 19, 2017;

THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by and through their counsel of record, as follows:

1. That the current scheduling order be modified to extend fact discovery to May 19, 2017, an additional five (5) days past the current cut-off date of May 15, 2017;

2. That all other dates in the pretrial scheduling order remain unchanged.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND REQUESTED BY THE PARTIES.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, (ECF No. 69), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the deadline for fact discovery, previously set for May 15, 2017, is VACATED and RESET for May 19, 2017, with all other dates in the scheduling order entered on November 3, 2016 remaining unchanged.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer