AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION v. MASTO, 2:08-cv-00822. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20131230j57
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2013
Summary: RESPONSE AND STIPULATION TO NOTICE REGARDING INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1 JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. On November 25, 2013. a Notice Regarding Intend to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant to Local Rule 41-1 was filed by the clerk's office and served on all parties in the above titled case [Docket No. 146]. The Notice stated that "[i]f no action is taken in this case by 12/25/2013, this office will make application to the court for dismissal fo
Summary: RESPONSE AND STIPULATION TO NOTICE REGARDING INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1 JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. On November 25, 2013. a Notice Regarding Intend to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant to Local Rule 41-1 was filed by the clerk's office and served on all parties in the above titled case [Docket No. 146]. The Notice stated that "[i]f no action is taken in this case by 12/25/2013, this office will make application to the court for dismissal for..
More
RESPONSE AND STIPULATION TO NOTICE REGARDING INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41-1
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
On November 25, 2013. a Notice Regarding Intend to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant to Local Rule 41-1 was filed by the clerk's office and served on all parties in the above titled case [Docket No. 146]. The Notice stated that "[i]f no action is taken in this case by 12/25/2013, this office will make application to the court for dismissal for want of prosecution. Prior to the Notice, the last substantive matter listed on the docket was the February 8, 2013 Order on Defendants Motion to Clarify Scope of Injunction [Docket No. 143].
Recently another, different question concerning the scope of the injunction has arisen. The parties have met and are continuing to resolve the issue without the need to seek the Court's assistance. Wherefore, the parties request that the case remain open and that a status check be scheduled for a date approximately 90 days from the present.
ORDER
It is hereby ordered that Case No. 2:08-cv-00822 shall remain open and that a status hearing be held on the March 27, 2014, at 10:00 AM in courtroom 6A.
Source: Leagle
