SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. BORETS WEATHERFORD U.S., INC., 2:12-CV-613-JRG-RSP. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Texas
Number: infdco20130912c53
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Weatherford International Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13, filed December 24, 2012). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 56, filed September 23, 2013). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Report and Recommendation, the Rec
Summary: ORDER RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Weatherford International Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13, filed December 24, 2012). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 56, filed September 23, 2013). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Report and Recommendation, the Reco..
More
ORDER
RODNEY GILSTRAP, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Weatherford International Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13, filed December 24, 2012). The Magistrate Judge filed a report recommending that the motion be denied. (Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. 56, filed September 23, 2013). No objections having been filed and for the reasons set forth in the Court's Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED.
Accordingly, Weatherford's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted (Dkt. No. 13) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
