ADAMS v. RIVERA, 3:11-CV-03021. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20120127c31
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, District Judge. Currently before the Court is the Amended Report and Recommendations (Doc. 26) filed in this case on December 1, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Report and Recommendations notes that Plaintiff has requested that this case be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 25). Defendants have fi
Summary: ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, District Judge. Currently before the Court is the Amended Report and Recommendations (Doc. 26) filed in this case on December 1, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Report and Recommendations notes that Plaintiff has requested that this case be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 25). Defendants have fil..
More
ORDER
P.K. HOLMES, III, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is the Amended Report and Recommendations (Doc. 26) filed in this case on December 1, 2011, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, Chief United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. More than fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Report and Recommendations notes that Plaintiff has requested that this case be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 25). Defendants have filed no objections to this request.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Defendant Toby Shearer's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
