Henderson v. Montgomery, 2:18-cv-05390-MWF-KES. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190722579
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 31). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkts. 34) have been made. The Court accepts the
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 31). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkts. 34) have been made. The Court accepts the ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 31). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkts. 34) have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Grounds One and Three are dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted.
Source: Leagle
