STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF DAUBERT MOTIONS

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr., District Judge.

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Proofpoint, Inc. and Armorize Technologies, Inc. ("Defendants," collectively with Plaintiff, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred in an effort to agree upon a modified schedule for Replies in support of Daubert Motions:

WHEREAS, the trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 13, 2016;

WHEREAS, the Pre-Trial Conference in this matter is currently scheduled for May 24, 2016;

WHEREAS, Replies in support of Daubert Motions are currently due on May 11, 2016 at noon;

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a limited extension for the Replies in support of Daubert Motions to May 11, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. as an accommodation to Defendants;

WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request the Court re-schedule the following deadline:

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the deadline for Replies in support of Daubert Motions be set as stipulated and proposed in the table above.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(I)

In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from any other signatory to this document.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Parties shall brief Replies in support of Daubert Motions as set forth in the May 11, 2016 Stipulation Regarding Replies in support of Daubert Motions .