Filed: Jan. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDANT NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2)] MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE ("Defendant"), by and through their respectiv
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDANT NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2)] MARIA-ELENA JAMES , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE ("Defendant"), by and through their respective..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST DEFENDANT NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS AGAINST CO-DEFENDANTS [F.R.C.P. §§ 41(a)(1)(ii) and (2)]
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS ("Plaintiff") and Defendant NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE ("Defendant"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate that:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice against Defendant.
2. The Court will Retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN FULL signed by both parties and approved by their respective attorneys.
3. All parties shall bear their own costs and fees in the action.
4. Plaintiff reserves his rights against co-defendants
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence of the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatory.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having reviewed the above Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice by Plaintiff JOHN RODGERS on the one hand ("Plaintiff") and Defendant NEW OHANA, INC., d/b/a OHANA HAWAIIAN BARBECUE ("Defendant") on the other hand,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice as against Defendant.
2. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN FULL signed by both parties and approved by their respective attorneys.
3. Each Party shall bear his own costs and fees in this action.
4. Plaintiff reserves his rights against Co-Defendants.
