Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. LATT, Cr.S. 13-0056-GEB. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130327c25 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JARED DOLAN, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and ANGELES ZARAGOZA Assistant Federal Defender attorney for Defendant, DAVID HAROLD LATT, JR., that the status conference set for Friday, March 29, 2013 be continued to Friday, May 17, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. Th
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, JARED DOLAN, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and ANGELES ZARAGOZA Assistant Federal Defender attorney for Defendant, DAVID HAROLD LATT, JR., that the status conference set for Friday, March 29, 2013 be continued to Friday, May 17, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for May 17, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

AGREED:

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including May 22, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) T4 (reasonable time for counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the March 29, 2013 status conference shall be continued until May 17, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer