United States v. Peterson, 1:18-CR-00074 LJO-SKO. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191122945
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2019
Summary: STIPULALTION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL AND/OR MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend defendant's time period to file a reply brief in this matter from November 22, 2019, to November 29, 2019. The date of sentencing, informal objections and formal objections would remain unchanged. Dated: November 21, 2019. /s/DAVID BALAKIAN David Balakian
Summary: STIPULALTION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL AND/OR MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend defendant's time period to file a reply brief in this matter from November 22, 2019, to November 29, 2019. The date of sentencing, informal objections and formal objections would remain unchanged. Dated: November 21, 2019. /s/DAVID BALAKIAN David Balakian,..
More
STIPULALTION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL AND/OR MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to extend defendant's time period to file a reply brief in this matter from November 22, 2019, to November 29, 2019.
The date of sentencing, informal objections and formal objections would remain unchanged.
Dated: November 21, 2019. /s/DAVID BALAKIAN
David Balakian,
Attorney for Defendant,
PHILLIP PETERSON
Dated: November 21 2019. /s/ HENRY CARBAJAL III
Henry Carbajal III,
Assistant U.S. Attorney.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
