Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Vega-Mendoza, 2:16-cr-178 MCE. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170123538 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney, through Katherine Lydon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender, Matthew C. Bockmon, attorney for Jose Vega-Mendoza that the status conference, currently scheduled for January 19, 2017, be continued to February 23, 2017 at
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney, through Katherine Lydon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender, Matthew C. Bockmon, attorney for Jose Vega-Mendoza that the status conference, currently scheduled for January 19, 2017, be continued to February 23, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The reasons for this continuance are to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to continue investigating the facts of the case and to discuss resolution of the case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including February 23, 2017; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

Time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including February 23, 2017, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the January 19, 2017 status conference shall be continued until February 23, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer