COX v. WARDEN, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, 2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140711932
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. On July 9, 2014, the undersigned held a scheduling conference. Lissa Gardner appeared for petitioner. Todd Marshall appeared for respondent. The court heard argument from counsel about scheduling briefing to address the application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to the claims in the petition. The parties are advised that the memoranda of points and authorities must be complete and independent documents. The court will not consider matters from prior briefing
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge. On July 9, 2014, the undersigned held a scheduling conference. Lissa Gardner appeared for petitioner. Todd Marshall appeared for respondent. The court heard argument from counsel about scheduling briefing to address the application of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to the claims in the petition. The parties are advised that the memoranda of points and authorities must be complete and independent documents. The court will not consider matters from prior briefing ..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
On July 9, 2014, the undersigned held a scheduling conference. Lissa Gardner appeared for petitioner. Todd Marshall appeared for respondent. The court heard argument from counsel about scheduling briefing to address the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to the claims in the petition. The parties are advised that the memoranda of points and authorities must be complete and independent documents. The court will not consider matters from prior briefing or pleadings that are incorporated by reference. In addition, respondent's responsive memorandum and petitioner's reply shall follow the organization of issues and claims set out in the opening brief.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. By February 12, 2016, petitioner shall file a memorandum of points and authorities addressing the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to each claim in the petition.
2. Within three months of the filing date of petitioner's opening memorandum, respondent shall file a responsive memorandum. Within three months of the filing date of respondent's response, petitioner shall file any reply.
Source: Leagle
