Thompson v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 4:18-CV-905 SWW. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20191003b25
Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2019
Summary: AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . This case comes before the Court on the parties' Agreed Protective Order. The Court orders that the videos from the locomotives involved in the subject incidents shall not be disclosed, produced, copied or disseminated to anyone who is not involved in this case by the parties. The Court further orders that the parties shall not allow the videos to be disseminated to the Internet or any outside electronic media. The Court furthe
Summary: AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT , District Judge . This case comes before the Court on the parties' Agreed Protective Order. The Court orders that the videos from the locomotives involved in the subject incidents shall not be disclosed, produced, copied or disseminated to anyone who is not involved in this case by the parties. The Court further orders that the parties shall not allow the videos to be disseminated to the Internet or any outside electronic media. The Court further..
More
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on the parties' Agreed Protective Order. The Court orders that the videos from the locomotives involved in the subject incidents shall not be disclosed, produced, copied or disseminated to anyone who is not involved in this case by the parties. The Court further orders that the parties shall not allow the videos to be disseminated to the Internet or any outside electronic media. The Court further orders that the parties' attorneys will ensure that if the videos are given to any employee of the parties' law firms or any outside expert, that these individuals will be advised of this Protective Order and they shall not disseminate the videos to the Internet or any outside electronic media. The Court further orders that the videos will be returned to defendant at the conclusion of the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
