Acosta v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC, 3:18-CV-05059-JD. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181015860
Visitors: 21
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CAP PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES AND RECOVERY AT $75,000 AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation filed by Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Alejandro Acosta ("Plaintiff"), and good cause appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS THAT: The Joint Stipulation is GRANTED in its entirety. Because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000, this C
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CAP PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES AND RECOVERY AT $75,000 AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation filed by Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Alejandro Acosta ("Plaintiff"), and good cause appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS THAT: The Joint Stipulation is GRANTED in its entirety. Because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000, this Co..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CAP PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGES AND RECOVERY AT $75,000 AND TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation filed by Defendant Lowe's Home Centers, LLC ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Alejandro Acosta ("Plaintiff"), and good cause appearing therefore, HEREBY ORDERS THAT:
The Joint Stipulation is GRANTED in its entirety. Because the amount in controversy does not exceed $75,000, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Thus, the case is remanded to the Alameda County Superior Court of California.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
