BORGMAN v. INSPHERE INSURANCE SOLUTIONS, INC., C 11-05638 CRB. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160818a89
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . James Otto has moved for sanctions against Defendants' attorneys. See Mot. for Sanctions (dkt. 57). The court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). After reviewing the relevant authorities and the parties' submissions, the Court concludes that Otto has the ability to furnish interested parties with a copy of this Court's Clarification Order (dkt. 55) as necessar
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . James Otto has moved for sanctions against Defendants' attorneys. See Mot. for Sanctions (dkt. 57). The court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). After reviewing the relevant authorities and the parties' submissions, the Court concludes that Otto has the ability to furnish interested parties with a copy of this Court's Clarification Order (dkt. 55) as necessary..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
James Otto has moved for sanctions against Defendants' attorneys. See Mot. for Sanctions (dkt. 57). The court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). After reviewing the relevant authorities and the parties' submissions, the Court concludes that Otto has the ability to furnish interested parties with a copy of this Court's Clarification Order (dkt. 55) as necessary, determines that additional relief is unwarranted, and DENIES the motion for sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
