Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jafarian v. Cashcall, Inc., 2:17-CV-03132-APG-(CWH). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180212788 Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2018
Summary: Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Response to the Complaint (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with LR 7-1(a), the plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian, and defendant, CashCall, Inc., stipulate as follows: 1. On December 29, 2017, Jafarian commenced the above-captioned action through the filing of a Complaint for Damages Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681, et seq. (ECF No. 1) in this Court. Jafarian served CashCall with the co
More

Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Response to the Complaint

(Second Request)

In accordance with LR 7-1(a), the plaintiff, Moharram Jafarian, and defendant, CashCall, Inc., stipulate as follows:

1. On December 29, 2017, Jafarian commenced the above-captioned action through the filing of a Complaint for Damages Pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681, et seq. (ECF No. 1) in this Court. Jafarian served CashCall with the complaint on January 3, 2018. (ECF No. 5.) In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(1)(a)(1) and 6(a)(1)(C), CashCall had up to and including January 24, 2018, to file a response to the Complaint. On January 23, 2018, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Response to the Complaint (ECF No. 15), which granted CashCall an extension until February 7, 2018.

2. CashCall and the plaintiff are engaged in settlement discussions.

3. Accordingly, the parties stipulate that CashCall shall have up to and including February 16, 2018, to file a response to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer