Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cooper v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, CV 17-8335-FMO (AGR). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180918970 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint (Dkt. Nos. 12, 31) are GRANTED IN PAR
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint (Dkt. Nos. 12, 31) are GRANTED IN PART as follows:

(1) Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 12) based on failure to exhaust remedies is denied without prejudice;

(2) Defendants' motions to dismiss the Monell claims in Claims One and Two is granted with leave to amend;

(3) Defendant Marbach's motion to dismiss the complaint (Dkt. No. 31) is granted with leave to amend; and

(4) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days after the district court's order. In addition to curing the deficiencies identified in this Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff may correct dates and the name of any defendant.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer