Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nexthome, Inc. v. Miramar International, Inc., 1:19-cv-01175 LJO JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20191113880 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS AND TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 27, 2019, the plaintiff initiated this action related to alleged alleged trademark infringements. (Doc. 1) The Court issued a summons on August 28, 2019 (Doc. 3) and its order setting the mandatory scheduling conference to occur on November 20, 2019 (Doc. 4). The plaintiff served the summon
More

ORDER TO THE PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS AND TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION

On August 27, 2019, the plaintiff initiated this action related to alleged alleged trademark infringements. (Doc. 1) The Court issued a summons on August 28, 2019 (Doc. 3) and its order setting the mandatory scheduling conference to occur on November 20, 2019 (Doc. 4). The plaintiff served the summons on Miramar International, Inc., on September 3, 2019, but the defendant has not filed a responsive pleading and the plaintiff has not sought default. The plaintiff has not filed a proof of service on Othon Ayon. Therefore, the Court ORDERS,

1. No later than November 22, 2019, the plaintiff SHALL show cause why sanctions, up to and including dismissal, should not be imposed for the failure to prosecute this action and comply with the Court's orders;

2. The scheduling conference is CONTINUED to December 20, 2019 at 9:30 a.m.

The plaintiff is advised that the failure to comply will result in sanctions as set forth above.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer