Garrett v. Macomber, 2:16-cv-1336 KJM AC P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20191213820
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a "motion for court ordered copies and law library access." ECF No. 104. In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are necessary to ensure that he receives timely legal copies and physical access to the law library. However, plaintiff has not alleged what he requires copies for or explained why he must have physical access to the law library. Nor has he demonstrated that an extension
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a "motion for court ordered copies and law library access." ECF No. 104. In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are necessary to ensure that he receives timely legal copies and physical access to the law library. However, plaintiff has not alleged what he requires copies for or explained why he must have physical access to the law library. Nor has he demonstrated that an extension o..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a "motion for court ordered copies and law library access." ECF No. 104. In his motion, plaintiff alleges that court orders are necessary to ensure that he receives timely legal copies and physical access to the law library. However, plaintiff has not alleged what he requires copies for or explained why he must have physical access to the law library. Nor has he demonstrated that an extension of time to complete whatever task he is working on would be insufficient address the delays he is facing. Plaintiff therefore has not demonstrated that his right of access to the courts is being impaired.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a court order, ECF No. 104, is denied.
Source: Leagle
