Dillingham v. Garcia, 1:18-cv-00579-LJO-EPG (PC). (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190724875
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 58) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Jerry Dillingham ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for administrative relief. (ECF No. 58). In light of the upcoming settlement conference, Plaintiff asks for an expedited ruling on his motion
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 58) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Jerry Dillingham ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for administrative relief. (ECF No. 58). In light of the upcoming settlement conference, Plaintiff asks for an expedited ruling on his motion f..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
(ECF No. 58)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Jerry Dillingham ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On July 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for administrative relief. (ECF No. 58). In light of the upcoming settlement conference, Plaintiff asks for an expedited ruling on his motion for leave to amend, and for an expedited screening of his amended complaint.1
Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. The Court will rule on Plaintiff's motion to amend, and if necessary, screen his complaint, in due course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court notes that the parties are not required to present evidence at the settlement conference.
Source: Leagle
