Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Washington v. Advance/Newhouse Partnership, 1:18-cv-0449-LJO-JLT. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190925999 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION (Doc. 20) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On September 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation they agreed "that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with the parties bearing their own attorneys' fees and costs." (Doc. 20 at 2) Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismi
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE ACTION

(Doc. 20)

On September 23, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation they agreed "that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with the parties bearing their own attorneys' fees and costs." (Doc. 20 at 2) Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." Because all remaining parties signed the stipulation, it automatically terminated the action. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer