Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MORTON v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., 2:17-cv-01794-JAM-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170922766 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED COMPLAINT; ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . STIPULATION This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff Karyl Morton ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., a corporation ("Defendant") (collectively with Plaintiff, "Parties"), by and through respective counsel. RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Verified Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief ("Co
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S VERIFIED COMPLAINT; ORDER

STIPULATION

This Stipulation is entered into by Plaintiff Karyl Morton ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., a corporation ("Defendant") (collectively with Plaintiff, "Parties"), by and through respective counsel.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Verified Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief ("Complaint") in this action on August 28, 2017.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served the Complaint on Defendant on August 30, 2017.

WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint is currently September 20, 2017.

WHEREAS, the Parties are exploring and discussing potential resolutions to this matter.

WHEREAS, the Parties have not completed those discussions and require additional time to do so.

BASED UPON THE FOREGOING, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

Good cause exists to extend Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to allow the Parties additional time to meet and confer regarding Defendant's response to the Complaint;

The Parties agree that the deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint should be extended to October 20, 2017; and,

The Parties agree that this Stipulation should be set for ex parte hearing, only if deemed necessary by the Court, at the earliest available time.

ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE

I attest under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that I have received the concurrence in the filing of this document from the listed signatories.

DATED: September 20, 2017 /s/Thomas A. Woods THOMAS A. WOODS

ORDER

Good cause appearing, based on the Stipulation by and between Plaintiff Karyl Morton and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., a foreign corporation (collectively, the "Parties"), the Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant's time respond to the Plaintiff's Verified Complaint for Damages and Equitable Relief is extended.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., a foreign corporation shall file and serve a response to Plaintiff's Complaint no later than October 20, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer