Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Benson v. Spearman, 2:17-cv-1881 MCE KJN P. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180507640 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 4, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and
More

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 4, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 4, 2018, are ADOPTED in full.

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 13) is partially GRANTED;

3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice;

4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253; and

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer