Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Edward Jones & Co., L.P. v. Delzio, 18-cv-05336-YGR. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180910684 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 14 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS , District Judge . The Court has reviewed parties' briefing regarding plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order and, or in the alternative, an order to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not be issued. ( See Dkt. Nos. 9, 21.) As stated during the telephone conference on Friday, September 7, 2018, the Court DENIES plaintiff's application for a temporary restr
More

ORDER RE: APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 14

The Court has reviewed parties' briefing regarding plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order and, or in the alternative, an order to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not be issued. (See Dkt. Nos. 9, 21.) As stated during the telephone conference on Friday, September 7, 2018, the Court DENIES plaintiff's application for a temporary restraining order1 and SETS, on an expedited basis, the following briefing schedule for plaintiff's upcoming motion for a preliminary injunction on an expedited basis:

Plaintiff's Opening Brief September 12, 2018 Defendant's Opposition/Response September 17, 2018 Plaintiff's Reply September 19, 2018 Hearing September 24, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

As noted during the September 7, 2018 conference, telephonic appearances will not be allowed and defendant Paul M. Delzio must appear personally for the September 24, 2018 hearing. This Order terminates Docket Numbers 9 and 14.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. In addition, plaintiff filed an administrative sealing motion in connection with its application for a temporary restraining order. (Dkt. No. 14.) Specifically, plaintiff seeks to seal documents containing the alleged trade secrets that are the subject of plaintiff's instant application and upcoming motion for preliminary injunction. These documents contain personal information, including names, address, account numbers, account balances, and investment portfolio data, belonging to plaintiff's clients. The private nature of this information constitutes compelling

Accordingly, plaintiff's administrative motion to seal is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer