Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Garces v. Pickett, 2:17-cv-0319 JAM AC P. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190510869 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 08, 2019
Latest Update: May 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for a court order directing the defendants to provide him with his legal work. ECF No. 64. In the motion, plaintiff states that he was transferred to a new prison on April 24, 2019, and is currently without his legal paperwork, though he has been told that it should arrive after ten days or after he is seen by the committee. Id. at 1-2. The motion is dated April 28, 2019. Id. at
More

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for a court order directing the defendants to provide him with his legal work. ECF No. 64. In the motion, plaintiff states that he was transferred to a new prison on April 24, 2019, and is currently without his legal paperwork, though he has been told that it should arrive after ten days or after he is seen by the committee. Id. at 1-2. The motion is dated April 28, 2019. Id. at 2.

It appears that plaintiff's legal property will be released to him shortly, if it has not already been released. The motion will therefore be denied. Should plaintiff require additional time to meet any deadline due to the delay in receiving his property, he should file a motion for extension of time explaining what deadlines he needs extended, how long of an extension he needs, and why he needs the extension. Plaintiff may also renew his motion for the return of his property if the prison continues to withhold it.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a court order (ECF No. 64) is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer