(HC) Figueroa-Guizar v. Keeton, 1:17-cv-00504-DAD-JLT (HC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180131a36
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 27) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479 , 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773 , 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 27) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479 , 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773 , 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests o..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 27)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, Title 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
