Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Burnett v. Asuncion, 18-cv-03243-JD. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20181023893 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 13 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Respondent filed an answer and the Court is waiting for petitioner's traverse. An attorney has filed a motion to be appointed by the Court for petitioner at public expense. The Sixth Amendment's right to counsel does not apply in habeas corpus actions. Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722 , 728 (9th Cir. 1986). Howe
More

ORDER Re: Dkt. Nos. 12, 13

Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed an answer and the Court is waiting for petitioner's traverse. An attorney has filed a motion to be appointed by the Court for petitioner at public expense. The Sixth Amendment's right to counsel does not apply in habeas corpus actions. Knaubert v. Goldsmith, 791 F.2d 722, 728 (9th Cir. 1986). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) provides that in habeas cases, whenever "the court determines that the interests of justice so require", representation may be provided for any financially eligible person. Petitioner has presented his claim adequately, and it is not particularly complex. The motion to appoint the attorney at public expense (Docket No. 12) is DENIED. However, the attorney is free to represent petitioner and file the appropriate motion of substitution. The motion for an extension to file a traverse (Docket No. 13) is GRANTED. Petitioner either pro se or through counsel may file the traverse by November 8, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer