Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Weiss v. See's Candy Shops Inc., 16-cv-00661-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170223c58 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2017
Summary: STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, plaintiff Avi Weiss and defendants See's Candies, Inc. and See's Candy Shops, Inc. (collectively "See's"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue
More

STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, plaintiff Avi Weiss and defendants See's Candies, Inc. and See's Candy Shops, Inc. (collectively "See's"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby respectfully stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue the case management conference and hearing on See's' motion to dismiss from April 13, 2017, to April 27, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, on January 19, 2017, the Court set the hearing on See's anticipated motion to dismiss and a further case management conference for April 13, 2017. Dkt. 37.

WHEREAS, lead counsel for See's is scheduled to be in arbitration in another matter from April 10 until April 14, 2017, and therefore cannot be present in this Court on April 13, 2017.

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and plaintiff agreed to defendants' request to continue the April 13, 2017 hearing and further case management conference until April 27, 2017.

WHEREAS, the only prior modification of time in this case occurred on February 29, 2016, when the parties agreed to extend See's deadline to respond the complaint to April 4, 2016.

WHEREAS, the continuance requested herein will not otherwise affect the schedule for the case.

WHEREAS, defendants' counsel Eric DiIulio attests that Suzanne Havens Beckman concurs in filing this stipulation.

STIPULATION

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and through their respective counsel, that the case management conference and the hearing on See's motion to dismiss presently scheduled for April 13, 2017, at 1:30 p.m., shall be continued to April 27, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer