Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MUNOZ v. WATSONVILLE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, 15-cv-00932-BLF. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170720780 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . Plaintiff moves to extend the discovery cut-off, currently set for July 14, 2017, to August 15, 2017. According to Plaintiff, various delays in the discovery process have prevented Plaintiff from obtaining a complete set of medical records relating to Defendant Watsonville Community Hospital's ("WCH") treatment of the decedent, Karina Munoz Hermosillo. Plaintiff thus request
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE

Plaintiff moves to extend the discovery cut-off, currently set for July 14, 2017, to August 15, 2017. According to Plaintiff, various delays in the discovery process have prevented Plaintiff from obtaining a complete set of medical records relating to Defendant Watsonville Community Hospital's ("WCH") treatment of the decedent, Karina Munoz Hermosillo. Plaintiff thus requests an extension of the discovery cut-off to allow for a motion to compel and a subpoena of third parties in an attempt to obtain the medical records.

Defendant WCH objects, arguing that all records have been produced and complaining that Plaintiff has failed to comply with ex parte rules. WCH further requests that if the Court extends discovery, that discovery be limited to Plaintiff seeking a motion to compel CHS/Community Health Systems Incorporated's ("CHSPSC") compliance with the previously issued subpoena for records and/or to subpoena Quorum Health for the records.

A motion to change a deadline in the scheduling order should be evaluated under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 16(b), requiring "good cause." Zivkovic v. S. Cal. Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002). Here, Plaintiff represents that WCH refused to discuss the existence of e-discovery or ProMed medical records, and only on July 13, 2017, did WCH inform Plaintiff that it did not have access to the requested documents. Mot. 2. Additionally, Plaintiff has experienced numerous delays despite diligent attempts to serve the subpoena on CHSPSC. Because Plaintiff was not apprised of WCH's inability to access the requested records until July 13, 2017, close to the discovery cut-off, and encountered difficulty in serving CHSPSC, the Court finds good cause to extend the discovery cut-off for a limited purpose. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART the motion to extend the discovery cut-off to August 15, 2017, solely for Plaintiff to seek an order compelling CHSPSC's production of records in Tennessee and to subpoena Quorum Health for the records. To the extent the motion requests the extension to allow for other discovery-related requests, the Court DENIES IN PART the motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer