Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. WOODS, 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160815c07 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER (Mot. for Joinder — ECF. No. 578). PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant Jason D. Woods' Motion for Joinder (ECF. No. 578) to Defendant Steven Stewart's A. Motion for Bill of Particulars (ECF. No. 551). This motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of Practice. On July 7, 2016, the government filed a Response (ECF. No. 580) to Defendant Stewart's motion and Stewart filed a Rep
More

ORDER

(Mot. for Joinder — ECF. No. 578).

This matter is before the court on Defendant Jason D. Woods' Motion for Joinder (ECF. No. 578) to Defendant Steven Stewart's A. Motion for Bill of Particulars (ECF. No. 551). This motion is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and LR IB 1-3 of the Local Rules of Practice. On July 7, 2016, the government filed a Response (ECF. No. 580) to Defendant Stewart's motion and Stewart filed a Reply (ECF. No. 606) on July 13, 2016. To avoid serial motions on the same issue, the court finds good cause to grant this joinder request. The government need not file a separate response to Woods' joinder unless the joinder raises new or different arguments than Stewart's motion.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED: Defendant Jason D. Woods' Motion for Joinder (ECF. No. 578) is GRANTED. The government's Response (ECF. No. 580) to Stewart's Motion (ECF. No. 551) shall serve as its response to Woods' joinder unless the joinder raises new or different arguments than Stewart's motion.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer