STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO CITY OF HENDERSON'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO RECONDISER MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH (ECF No. 125)

[ECF No. 135]

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, THOMAS WALKER and CATHY CATALDO (hereinafter "Plaintiffs"), by and through their attorneys of record, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell of McLetchie Shell, LLC and Jennifer L. Braster of Naylor & Braster, and City of Henderson, by and through its counsel of record, Josh M. Reid, Esq. and Nancy D. Savage, Esq., of the City of Henderson's City Attorney's Office, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED to by the Parties that the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply to City of Henderson's Response to Plaintiffs' Request to Reconsider Magistrate Judge's Order on Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena (ECF No. 125) in the above entitled matter shall be extended for eight days from May 22, 2017, which would now make the Reply due by May 30, 2017.

This stipulation is made because counsel for Plaintiffs had an opening brief on May 17, 2017 with the Nevada Supreme Court in James v. State, Case No. 71935. Counsel for plaintiffs also had a reply brief due that same day with the Nevada Supreme Court in Richard v. State, Case No. 71288. Additionally, counsel for Plaintiffs was required to travel to Lovelock, Nevada from May 19, 2017 through May 20, 2017 to visit a client in another matter in which counsel is appointed post-conviction counsel. In addition, Plaintiffs are conducting depositions of the North Las Vegas Police Department's Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) witnesses May 23, 2017, through May 25, 2017. As such, the stipulation for an extension of time is not for any improper purpose or for the purpose of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.