Elawyers Elawyers
Illinois| Change

U.S. v. SILVA-HARO, CR.S-12-311-MCE. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130502b61 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, SAMUEL WONG Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN Assistant Federal Defender for JOSE SILVA-HARO that the status conference hearing date of May 16, 2013 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on June 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The reaso
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER; CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, SAMUEL WONG Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN Assistant Federal Defender for JOSE SILVA-HARO that the status conference hearing date of May 16, 2013 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on June 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is that defense counsel needs additional time to continue further defense investigation and preparation. In particular, defense counsel will be visiting the alleged marijuana garden with her investigator to conduct the defense team's own investigation and may need to conduct follow up research and/or investigation depending on what is discovered in the marijuana garden. The marijuana garden visit by the defense team, accompanied by a law enforcement escort team for safety and security reasons, is tentatively scheduled for May 20 or 21, 2013. In addition, defense counsel desires to meet with the prosecutor in an attempt to negotiate as favorable as possible to defendant a resolution of this case after visiting the marijuana garden. Thereafter, defense counsel will need additional time to explain the ramifications to defendant of any plea offer made.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that the time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from the date of this stipulation, April 29, 2013, through and including June 27, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv) and Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and need for additional time for defense preparation. The parties stipulate and agree that the Court shall find that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the May 16, 2013, status conference hearing be continued to June 27, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that time beginning from the parties' stipulation on April 29, 2013, up to and including the June 27, 2013 status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, for continuity of counsel and to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer