Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WHITSITT v. PATRICIO ENTERPRISES, 2:13-cv-0118 KJM GGH PS. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140409992 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed an "objection to defendant New Breed Logistics motion to dismiss hearing date of 27 days from service of motion move the court to grant additional 30 days to answer and file my opposition to motion to dismiss and hearing date," [sic], which the court construes as a motion for extension of time to file an opposition to defendants New Breed Logistics and Sasse's motion to dismiss, as well as for a continuation of the April 17, 2014
More

ORDER

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff has filed an "objection to defendant New Breed Logistics motion to dismiss hearing date of 27 days from service of motion move the court to grant additional 30 days to answer and file my opposition to motion to dismiss and hearing date," [sic], which the court construes as a motion for extension of time to file an opposition to defendants New Breed Logistics and Sasse's motion to dismiss, as well as for a continuation of the April 17, 2014 hearing date. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's March 24, 2014 motion for an extension of time is granted;

2. Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss (ECF No 22). Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter.

3. The hearings on motions to dismiss filed both by defendants New Breed Logistics and Sasse, and by defendants San Joaquin County Worknet and Sansone (ECF Nos. 22 and 13) are vacated from the calendar for April 17, 2014, and taken under submission. A hearing will be re-set only if necessary.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer