PERRY v. BROWN, 639 F.3d 1153 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: inadvfco110817000070
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2011
Summary: ORDER Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1749 , 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs' motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097 , 1101 (9th Cir.2006), we deny Plaintiffs' motion at this time.
ORDER
Having considered all of the factors set forth in Nken v. Holder, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1749, 1756, 173 L.Ed.2d 550 (2009), and all of the facts and circumstances surrounding Plaintiffs' motion to vacate the stay pending appeal, as well as the standard for vacatur set forth in Southeast Alaska Conservation Council v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 472 F.3d 1097, 1101 (9th Cir.2006), we deny Plaintiffs' motion at this time.
Source: Leagle
