Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. DOVALA, CR 17-0301 JST. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20171010b30 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MATTER AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION The parties appeared before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar on September 29, 2017, for an initial status conference. Defense counsel is still reviewing the discovery produced by the government, and needs additional time to assess the case and review options with Mr. Dovala. The parties requested, and the Court granted, a continuance until November 3, 2017.
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING MATTER AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

STIPULATION

The parties appeared before the Honorable Jon S. Tigar on September 29, 2017, for an initial status conference. Defense counsel is still reviewing the discovery produced by the government, and needs additional time to assess the case and review options with Mr. Dovala. The parties requested, and the Court granted, a continuance until November 3, 2017. The parties also stipulated, and the Court ordered, that time between September 29, 2017 and November 3, 2017, be excluded for effective preparation of counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

The parties further stipulate, and ask the Court to find, that the requested continuance and exclusion of time are in the interests of justice and outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

For the reasons stated, this matter is continued until November 3, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. The time between September 29, 2017, and November 3, 2017, is excluded from the running of the speedy trial clock for effective preparation of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). Failure to grant the continuance would deny the defendant's counsel the reasonable time necessary to prepare, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Attestation of Filer

In addition to myself, the other signatory to this document is Adam Pennella. I attest that I have his permission to enter a conformed signature on his behalf and to file the document.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer